Hazards to the Hands
Using the Right Gloves
OS and H Act, Section 5 (a) – General Duty Clause
29CFR 1910 Subpart I – 1910.132 Personal Protective Equipment, General Requirements
Occupational Safety and Health Standards - 29 CFR 1910.138 General Requirements for Personal Protective Equipment – Hand Protection
Occupational Safety and Health Standards - 29 CFR 1910.212 General requirements for all machines. - Machinery and Machine Guarding
1910.269 – Line Clearance/Tree Trimming
American National Standard for Hand Protection - Selection Criteria: ANSI/ISEA 105-2005
Identify common hazards to the hands
List methods and devices used to prevent hand injuries
Describe the differences in hand protection devices (gloves)
Occupational hand injuries account for more than one million emergency room visits per year.
No matter what kind of work you do, you probably use many tools in your job. In many instances, your hands are the tools for the job and the rules you’d employ to take care of other tools also apply to your hands. For example, always use the correct tool for the job. It is “misuse” to use a tool for something other than it was intended. Never use your hands when another appropriate tool exists for the job.
The first step in preventing hand injuries is to know the hazards involved in your job and how to avoid them.
Injuries often occur because workers have bypassed or deactivated safety features on equipment. Perhaps they find it cumbersome, but guards and other safety features serve an important purpose—never tamper with them or modify controls that exist to protect you from specific injury, no matter how inconvenient these devices may appear.
Also, don’t remove personal protective equipment (PPE). For example, frostbite in the workplace often occurs because a worker removes his protective gloves in an extremely cold environment. Typically, he believes this will only be long enough to do some task that requires greater finger dexterity than can be accomplished with his gloves on, and this miscalculation creates serious risk.
Some injuries occur when employees choose not to follow process instructions. Often this is due to boredom with a routine task or the mistaken sense that the worker is experienced enough to bypass instructions.
In addition, distraction in the form of a wandering mind or wandering eyes can lead to injury. When working near hazards, you must always keep your mind on the task and your eyes on the job. Don’t rush and if you find yourself frustrated, stop and take a break. Frustration leads to carelessness and injury.
Finally, beware of thinking you can bend the rules “just this once.”
Engineering controls eliminate or effectively reduce hazards through safeguards built specifically to mitigate certain hazards, i.e., where equipment itself has built-in measures to protect the user. Engineering controls are always the preferred way to eliminate or reduce hazards, because the safety measure is built-in. They are the first line of defense. Engineering controls must be routinely calibrated and maintained to ensure they will work the way they are supposed to, every time.
Administrative controls are the procedures that you put in place to protect your workforce. While engineering controls are preferred, administrative controls are useful if engineering controls simply cannot be implemented, or when engineering controls alone cannot effectively reduce risk. Because administrative controls do not eliminate hazards, it is critical that employees follow the policies that safety professionals put in place. A good example is the adoption of a 100% glove use policy—gloves are to be used for all tasks.
Personal protective equipment is worn to minimize exposure to hazards when engineering and administrative controls are not feasible or are not sufficient to reduce hazards to acceptable levels. To protect hands from certain types of injury, gloves are the primary piece of PPE. PPE is considered the third line of defense, after engineering and administrative controls.
One of the most effective ways to protect your hands is to wear gloves when appropriate. In fact, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 70% of workers who get hand injuries were not wearing gloves. The other 30%, who were wearing gloves, received their injury because their gloves were inadequate, damaged or were the wrong type of glove for the hazard.